Conspiracy theories like flat earth or 9/11 are true - DebateIsland Development Environment The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com
frame

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

DebateIsland Development Environment


The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!

Conspiracy theories like flat earth or 9/11 are true
in Philosophy

This will be fun 


ErfisflatpiloteerRam_Rancher_18
https://www.google.com/search?q=victims+of+religion&safe=active&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=x&ved=0ahukewihu9jugorfahwkmeakhbtib00q_auidigb&biw=1920&bih=963&safe=active

Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news

Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom 

http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
«13



Debra AI Prediction

Predicted To Win
Predicted 2nd Place
Tie
Margin

Details +



Arguments

  • ErfisflatErfisflat 1637 Pts
    edited September 2018
    i
    Zombieguy1987George_HorseEvidence
    Pseudoscience: noun; a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.

    Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.

    The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.

    Wayne Dyer
  • ErfisflatErfisflat 1637 Pts
    edited September 2018
    Double fail.
    Zombieguy1987George_Horse
    Pseudoscience: noun; a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.

    Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.

    The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.

    Wayne Dyer
  • When @Erfisflat uses a fail meme, instead of actually making an argument that conspiracy theories are true.

    1/10 needs more arguments -DebateIsland  
    General_Smileycheesycheese
    https://www.google.com/search?q=victims+of+religion&safe=active&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=x&ved=0ahukewihu9jugorfahwkmeakhbtib00q_auidigb&biw=1920&bih=963&safe=active

    Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news

    Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom 

    http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  • When @Erfisflat uses a fail meme, instead of actually making an argument that conspiracy theories are true.

    1/10 needs more arguments -DebateIsland  
    I put forth more effort than you have. The debates are already up, instead of trying to be funny, rebut the arguments already in those debates.
    Zombieguy1987
    Pseudoscience: noun; a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.

    Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.

    The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.

    Wayne Dyer
  • Erfisflat said:
    When @Erfisflat uses a fail meme, instead of actually making an argument that conspiracy theories are true.

    1/10 needs more arguments -DebateIsland  
    I put forth more effort than you have. The debates are already up, instead of trying to be funny, rebut the arguments already in those debates.
    The "effort" you put up was a meme. If that's what you call effort than something is wrong with you.
    https://www.google.com/search?q=victims+of+religion&safe=active&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=x&ved=0ahukewihu9jugorfahwkmeakhbtib00q_auidigb&biw=1920&bih=963&safe=active

    Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news

    Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom 

    http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  • Erfisflat said:
    When @Erfisflat uses a fail meme, instead of actually making an argument that conspiracy theories are true.

    1/10 needs more arguments -DebateIsland  
    I put forth more effort than you have. The debates are already up, instead of trying to be funny, rebut the arguments already in those debates.
    The "effort" you put up was a meme. If that's what you call effort than something is wrong with you.
    Your effort?:
    "This will be fun".

    That's ignoring the wealth of evidence in the original debates.
    Zombieguy1987Evidence
    Pseudoscience: noun; a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.

    Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.

    The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.

    Wayne Dyer
  • @Erfisflat ;

    The reason I said "This will be fun" is because I don't want to regurgitate the same stuff from other debates.  Also, when I made this, it had no relevance to your debates. 
    Erfisflat
    https://www.google.com/search?q=victims+of+religion&safe=active&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=x&ved=0ahukewihu9jugorfahwkmeakhbtib00q_auidigb&biw=1920&bih=963&safe=active

    Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news

    Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom 

    http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  • @Erfisflat ;

    The reason I said "This will be fun" is because I don't want to regurgitate the same stuff from other debates.  Also, when I made this, it had no relevance to your debates. 
    So, you making a debate about the other debates, also ignores the evidence in those debates?
    Zombieguy1987
    Pseudoscience: noun; a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.

    Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.

    The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.

    Wayne Dyer
  • @Erfisflat
     
    You say ....The wealth of evidence......
    Zombieguy1987
  • @Joeseph:

    Are you a hate minded? 

    Your meme, is quite the gift.

    The topic of Religion caused you to leave your filth meme on someone else's forum, because you wanted to make a statement? 
    Zombieguy1987
  • Zombieguy1987TTKDB
  • @Joeseph

    Whats wrong mr intellectual atheist, you didn't have enough intellectual prowess to get challengedon how you misuse memes? 

    It must be nice to come to this website and trash the religious parents and kids with your atheist mindset.

    Zombieguy1987
  • @TTKDB

    You say ..... challengedon how you misuse memes? 

    My reply .... Can you translate this nonsense into comprehensible English ? Is that something you think you could manage ? 
    Zombieguy1987Erfisflat
  • @Joeseph:

    Pardon me, 

    Whats wrong mr intellectual atheist, you didn't have enough intellectual prowess to get challenged on how you misuse memes? 


    Zombieguy1987Evidence
  • @TTKDB

    You say .....Whats wrong mr intellectual atheist, you didn't have enough intellectual prowess to get challenged on how you misuse memes? 

    My reply ..... This from you typically makes little or no sense , it seems I’m not alone in failing to understand a single thing you say 
    Zombieguy1987TTKDB
  • @Joeseph

    Do you view the religious parents as killers? 

    Do you have any legitimate evidence to support your view? 










  • Joeseph
    https://www.google.com/search?q=victims+of+religion&safe=active&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=x&ved=0ahukewihu9jugorfahwkmeakhbtib00q_auidigb&biw=1920&bih=963&safe=active

    Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news

    Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom 

    http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  • @TTKDB

    You say .....


    Do you view the religious parents as killers? 

    My reply .... What are you babbling about ?

    You say .....

    Do you have any legitimate evidence to support your view? 


    My reply .... What  are you babbling about ? 


    TTKDB
  • @Zombieguy1987

    Oh dear , /TTKDB is going to get rather upset at that list methinks 
    Zombieguy1987TTKDB
  • @Zombieguy1987:

    What, no court case documentation? 

    Your evidence is from an internet search? 

    Zombieguy1987
  • @Joeseph

    Where's your court case evidence to support your claims? 


    Zombieguy1987
  • @TTKDB ;
    You do realize, you can search their names and see that it's true, you know
    https://www.google.com/search?q=victims+of+religion&safe=active&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=x&ved=0ahukewihu9jugorfahwkmeakhbtib00q_auidigb&biw=1920&bih=963&safe=active

    Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news

    Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom 

    http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  • JoesephJoeseph 554 Pts
    edited September 2018
    @TTKDB

    Google is your friend and maybe you could supply court evidence for your god while you’re about it ?
    Zombieguy1987TTKDB
  • @Joeseph:

    The internet is your crutch. 


    Zombieguy1987
  • @Zombieguy1987:

    So your stance is this, religious individuals committed crimes? 

    So you're blaming religion as the reason for why the individuals committed the crimes?

    So in other words, it's religions fault for why the individuals committed their crimes? 

    That's your stance? 


    Zombieguy1987
  • JoesephJoeseph 554 Pts
    edited September 2018
    @TTKDB

    Ah I see you ask for proof and then claim the tool to find it is my “crutch “well it’s certainly not yours is it ? 

    Maybe you need to bury your sand ....again.
    Zombieguy1987TTKDB
  • @Joeseph:

    From your response, your head is residing in the internet's sandland. 

    What is your view on these questions to Zombieguy1987? 

    (So your stance is this, religious individuals committed crimes? 

    So you're blaming religion as the reason for why the individuals committed the crimes?

    So in other words, it's religions fault for why the individuals committed their crimes? 

    That's your stance?)


    Zombieguy1987
  • @Joeseph:

    (You say ......So your stance is this, religious individuals committed crimes?)

    "My reply .... Yeah , just like your god."

    What did God do? 

    Did he commit a crime against you? 

    Did a individual commit a crime against you?

    Oh wait, if he's religious yeah, the individual is guilty.

    (You say ......So you're blaming religion as the reason for why the individuals committed the crimes?)

    "My reply ..... Why are you saying the people are not religious?"

    I'm saying that religion has nothing to do with an individual committing a crime.

    It's on the individual who committed the crime. 

    Have you ever heard of a case where an offender and religion got tried at the same time for an individual committing a crime? 

    (You say ......So in other words, it's religions fault for why the individuals committed their crimes? 
    That's your stance?)


    "My reply ..... yeah , shocking isn’t it?"

    Here's a counter argument.

    Your answer isn't shocking, it's a commonly expressed stance.

    If an offender breaks a law and gets arrested, is it the laws fault that the offender got arrested, or the offenders fault? 







    Zombieguy1987
  • @TTKDB



    “Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked.  Show no mercy; have no pity!  Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children.  But do not touch anyone with the mark.  Begin your task right here at the Temple.”  So they began by killing the seventy leaders.  “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded.  “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill!  Go!”  So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” (Ezekiel 9:5-7 NLT)

    TTKDBZombieguy1987
  • @Joeseph:

    Pulling some words from the Bible, so when an offender kills someone and the judge asks the offender why they did what they did, and the offender says this to the judge as their defense:

    “Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked.  Show no mercy; have no pity!  Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children.  But do not touch anyone with the mark.  Begin your task right here at the Temple.”  So they began by killing the seventy leaders.  “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded.  “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill!  Go!”  So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” (Ezekiel 9:5-7 NLT)

    What do you think the judge might say to the offender, your chosen words from the Bible is your reason for having killed someone? 

    Do you think that the judge will view the offenders choice of words from the Bible as a valid excuse? 

    Do you think that the family of the killed individual will buy off on the offenders use of some words from the Bible will make a valid excuse for the offender in that families view? 

    I see what your stance is, but I'm looking at your stance from how society in general might view it. 

    When some people kill innocent people, I doubt that they blaming Religion for their loved one being killed is going to be how they view that stance.
    Zombieguy1987
  • @Joeseph:

    Your stance doesn't have any footing in the modern society. 
    Zombieguy1987
  • @TTKDB

    Are you drinking or on meds as I haven’t a clue what you’re babbling about 
    TTKDBErfisflatZombieguy1987
  • @TTKDB

    What you’re talking about is beyond me as .....


    Zombieguy1987TTKDB
  • @Joeseph:

    You can tap dance with your stance as much as you want to, 

    But the truth is this, 

    Your stance doesn't have any footing in the modern society. 



    Zombieguy1987
  • @Joeseph

    There you go again playing in the internet's sandland with your memes.

    And I'm standing by this stance:


    You can tap dance with your stance as much as you want to, 

    But the truth is this, 

    Your stance doesn't have any footing in the modern society. 

    Zombieguy1987
  • @TTKDB


    “Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked.  Show no mercy; have no pity!  Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children.  But do not touch anyone with the mark.  Begin your task right here at the Temple.”  So they began by killing the seventy leaders.  “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded.  “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill!  Go!”  So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” (Ezekiel 9:5-7 NLT)
    TTKDBZombieguy1987
  • @TTKDB


    “Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked.  Show no mercy; have no pity!  Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children.  But do not touch anyone with the mark.  Begin your task right here at the Temple.”  So they began by killing the seventy leaders.  “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded.  “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill!  Go!”  So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” (Ezekiel 9:5-7 NLT)
    TTKDBZombieguy1987
  • @TTKDB


    “Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked.  Show no mercy; have no pity!  Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children.  But do not touch anyone with the mark.  Begin your task right here at the Temple.”  So they began by killing the seventy leaders.  “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded.  “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill!  Go!”  So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” (Ezekiel 9:5-7 NLT)
    TTKDBZombieguy1987
  • @Joeseph:

    Still feeding off of your atheist memes to re feed them to the website? 

    The atheist meme herder does it again.


    Zombieguy1987
  • @Zombieguy1987:

    Why are you sitting on the sidelines with your thumbs up for? 


    Zombieguy1987
  • @Joeseph:

    See if you can get Zombieguy1987 to give you another thumbs up? 
    Zombieguy1987Joeseph
  • @Zombieguy1987:

    You didn't appreciate this? 

    (Joeseph: You can tap dance with your stance as much as you want to, 

    But the truth is this, 

    Your stance doesn't have any footing in the modern society.)
    Zombieguy1987Joeseph
  • @Zombieguy1987:

    You didn't appreciate this either? 

    (Joeseph: Who do you put first Joeseph?

    Society as a whole, or do you place your stance and yourself above the rest of society?  

    Exactly how far does your diminishing of everyone who doesn't have and live with your very mindset? 

    Bring on another meme.

    Keep feeding off of the internet for your meme searches Joe)


    Zombieguy1987
  • Zombieguy1987Zombieguy1987 441 Pts
    edited September 2018
    TTKDB said:
    @Zombieguy1987:

    Why are you sitting on the sidelines with your thumbs up for? 


    School, that’s why. Which you might want to return too
    TTKDB
    https://www.google.com/search?q=victims+of+religion&safe=active&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=x&ved=0ahukewihu9jugorfahwkmeakhbtib00q_auidigb&biw=1920&bih=963&safe=active

    Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news

    Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom 

    http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  • @TTKDB ;

    He just did , are you upset ?
    Zombieguy1987TTKDB
  • @Joeseph:

    Neither one of you atheists make sense.

    You treat people like toilet paper. 
    Zombieguy1987
  • JoesephJoeseph 554 Pts
    edited September 2018
    @TTKDB


    You say ......Neither one of you atheists make sense.

    My reply ..... That’s hilarious coming from you who had 4 debates taken down for .....making .......no ...sense 

    You say .....You treat people like toilet paper. 

    My reply .... But yet you worship a god who has commanded the  slaughter of men , women and infants and see that as morally perfect  behaviour  ..... I think you’re confused son 
    Zombieguy1987TTKDB
  • TTKDB said:
    @Joeseph:

    Neither one of you atheists make sense.

    You treat people like toilet paper. 
    If I treat people like toilet paper, then why did I like your arguments on the earth is ball shaped then?
    https://www.google.com/search?q=victims+of+religion&safe=active&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=x&ved=0ahukewihu9jugorfahwkmeakhbtib00q_auidigb&biw=1920&bih=963&safe=active

    Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news

    Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom 

    http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  • @Joeseph:

    (You say ......Neither one of you atheists make sense.

    My reply ..... That’s hilarious coming from you who had 4 debates taken down for .....making .......no ...sense)

    It's sad dude, it shows how you apparently like to manipulate debates via behind the scenes by flagging and reporting them because they opposed your stance that again has no footing in modern society, does it? 

    You've gloated over your handiwork, how many times? 

    You still continue to show the participants who don't share your stance on this website, how your stance influences your thinking and reasoning, doesn't it? 

    I bet that you think that you're smarter than the religious parents aren't you Joe? 

    If you say yes, then prove it? 

    (You say .....You treat people like toilet paper.)

    Look at your response, no sign of "No" from you at all right?

    Nope, not a hint of an attempt whatsoever.

    But look at your answer..

    "My reply .... But yet you worship a god who has commanded the  slaughter of men , women and infants and see that as morally perfect  behaviour  ..... I think you’re confused son."

    Nope, still not seeing a denial in your above words? 

    But just a vague response and you reiterating your same stance that again has no footing in the modern society does it? 

    Blaming God as you continue to do is the only back bone that your stance has to it, right? 

    The behavior behind your stance is self evident.



    Zombieguy1987Joeseph
  • @Erfisflat ;

    The reason I said "This will be fun" is because I don't want to regurgitate the same stuff from other debates.  Also, when I made this, it had no relevance to your debates. 
    Since we got interrupted, was this a challenge? One on one, I'd be interested if we had no more interruptions. What do you say?
    Zombieguy1987
    Pseudoscience: noun; a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.

    Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.

    The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.

    Wayne Dyer
Sign In or Register to comment.

Back To Top

DebateIsland.com

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
2019 DebateIsland.com, All rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Awesome Debates
BestDealWins.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch