The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Protecting environment or economic development: which is more important?
in General
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
for example, it would be unreasonable to say that we should pay a million dollars to remediate one plastic bottle from the environment. So it is an ROI question.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 96%  
  Substantial: 52%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 14%  
  Learn More About Debra
Demands on the natural environment will increase exponentially.
Unless mankind is prepared to take serious action to drastically reduced human population growth.
Unfortunately the human species does seem to be instinctively selfish and greedy.
So the chances of any decisive action being taken, looks pretty slim to me.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 70%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 41%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 96%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
I'm assuming you meant cost and that cist isn't an acronym.
I'm also assuming you are referring to financial cost.
What is financial cost?
Financial cost is merely a social concept.
Whereas environmental damage is a reality.
Of course money and inherent human selfishness go hand in hand. So environmental problems will inevitably, always take second place.
Nonetheless, exponential population growth is a problem which could be easily addressed. At little or no financial cost.
All that is required is a common sense agreement between nations.
Trouble is, common sense seems to be a quality that is sadly lacking in today's society.
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
I mostly agree. However, financial damage can be just as much of a reality for many people. I do think that the long-term damage caused by negligence of the environment is more pertinent and that simply leaving it to the market won't work, because as you said, people are more likely to want to financially protect themselves than the environment.
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
If we take your argument that we should protect environment at all cost then as @melanielust pointed out we will be making financially devastating decisions.
Everything is based on financial considerations. It is just a question of return on investment. If we can improve our ozone layer by 1%, would you pay 100 trillion dollars, essentially causing another Great Depression?
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 44%  
  Learn More About Debra
Of course conceptuality is the essence of the human condition, so referring to oneself as a realist can easily be regarded as contradictory and hypocritical.
Nonetheless. What is damage to the environment? What is a 100 trillion dollars?
I would argue that damage to the environment is real. Whereas 100 trillion dollars is only conceptual.
Tap another nought on to a computer screen and instead of 10 trillion dollars you have 100 trillion dollars.
Allow the human population to increase by another billion and the demand for resources and impact on the environment becomes ever greater.
Money is in fact irrelevant.
Our environment is totally relevant.
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.18  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 64%  
  Learn More About Debra