The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Another Question for Anti-Science Atheists
in Science
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
If the police already tracked him down to his apartment, they must have had enough evidence to get them there, right? The rest is easy, the money was right there.
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 21%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well then who "caught him with the stolen money"? His mom, .. his wife, .. who? Why did they think it was the money stolen from that bank robbery, did the serial numbers match or something? Was the exact amount that was stolen all there? Does he have teen aged kids?
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 56%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 44%  
  Substantial: 52%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
The only answer I could get close to would be if your question was "The evidence was not clear that it was him for certain." Then I would answer if the evidence does not support the claim that he is guilty then no. I would vote not guilty.
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
What "accurate" answer was given and how to you know it was "accurate"?
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 20%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 64%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
No 'theist' could answer this properly either.
Biblically speaking, and having come to know who our Creator God Is scientifically and philosophically, 'miracles' do happen all the time as I have witnessed it many times throughout my life, and continue to do so. So with that in mind, IMHO your question wreaks of deception, starts off asking us to "assume" something, then you go into "criminal law", telling us that the man was caught with the "stolen money"!?
@ViceRegent said: Assume you are sitting on a jury in a criminal trial with a man accused of bank robbery. Assume further this man was caught with the stolen money in his apartment. He claims that the money just appeared out of nothing the moments before the police arrived. Would you acquit this man? Why or why not?
My answer is: "Why"
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Prove it.
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 67%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yes, the atheist worldview is anti-science. This, to the degree they engage in empirical study, they are acting inconsistently with their own worldview and stealing from mine. This is why Christians have us modern science and atheists are taking us back to mysticism.
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
For your actual question, you can't bring the divine as an excuse for being caught with money, so you should convict the person based on your assumptions, though you fail to discuss any reasons for why he has the money in the first place. Was there a second hitman, or was it because of the divine?
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Furthermore in the acquittal process it is the duty of the jury to consider whether the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction. By giving this vague, short, unspecific hypothetical, and then asking us to make a judgment on weather a made up man, committed a made up crime, with no evidence presented, aside from one claim the defendant has maid, which is that the money appeared from no where.
  Considerate: 67%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 31%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
The Q stands on its own, you inferences notwithstanding.
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 20%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
@ViceRegent prove what, that miracles happen and I witnessed it and was part of it many times in my life? Or that I can define our Creator?
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 43%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 71%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 66%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
Stop trying to change the subject and answer the Q. Thus is hilarious how irrational these people are.
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 49%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra