The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Should America have gun control?
in Politics
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
Maybe requiring a psychological evaluation prior to a weapon/s purchase?
Because apparently, if a background check checks out, and an individual is able to purchase a weapon, and then later on, that same individual, goes about committing a crime with that same weapon, then maybe additional steps could be added to the process of being able to purchase a weapon?
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.46  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.52  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 34%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 31%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 16%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 52%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 48%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 26%  
  Substantial: 65%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.32  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 39%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 61%  
  Learn More About Debra
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 29%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 31%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 37%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.76  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
And the second amendment, in a criminal case, isn't what the second amendment is for, or about.
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
An excerpt from the webpage:
"Restrictions on Some Gun Owners
Federal law outlaws the possession of firearms or ammunition by several categories of people, including:
(18 U.S.C. § 922(g).)
Many states also prohibit or restrict gun possession by other groups of people, such as stalkers and people subject to other kinds of restraining orders, minors, juvenile offenders, and those convicted of alcohol- and/or drug-related crimes. And a few states allow courts to order some people to give up their guns temporarily if they pose an immediate risk to themselves or others."
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.6  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 14%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 39%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 65%  
  Learn More About Debra
Why or how do these other conversations get pulled into this forum:
(Should America have gun control?)
"What other rights do you think citizens should be required to get governmental, law enforcement and medical permission to exercise, freedom of the press, assembly, religion?"
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 79%  
  Learn More About Debra
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 50%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.74  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 31%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 75%  
  Learn More About Debra
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.12  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
A response for this from you:
"Chicago..
The city with some of the strictest gun control laws...
Has one of the worst crime rates in the country...
Why?
There's a thing called the black market, and it doesn't care about laws."
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.6  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
I believe that the theme of the forum is this:
(Should America have gun control?)
"What other rights do you think citizens should be required to get governmental, law enforcement and medical permission to exercise, freedom of the press, assembly, religion?"
"It's a pertinent question, since we're talking about restricting Constitutional rights."
When you pull these words into the theme of the forum:
"What other rights do you think citizens should be required to get governmental, law enforcement and medical permission to exercise, freedom of the press, assembly, religion?"
Aren't you in a sense, changing up the dynamic of the premise of the current forum, with your outside of the original premise, points of view?
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.34  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra
Perhaps it does change the dynamic, but it's nonetheless valid. I believe we should consider the ramifications of actions before we promote them.
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 64%  
  Learn More About Debra
From The Washington Times:
"Rahm Emanuel blames Chicago violence on 'shortage of values'
"Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel blamed the city’s massive crime problem on a “shortage of values” after at least 75 people were shot over the weekend."
“We have a heavy heart,” the Democratic mayor said at a news conference Monday. “Our souls are burdened. What happened this weekend did not happen in every neighborhood of Chicago but it is unacceptable to happen in any neighborhood of Chicago. We are a better city.”
"Between 3 p.m. Friday and 6 a.m. Monday, 12 people were killed and 63 wounded, ranging from ages 11 to 62, the Chicago Tribune reported. No arrests have yet been made."
"He also said placing the blame for the violence on higher summer temperatures, when crime typically spikes, would be a mistake."
"Mr. Emanuel called on residents to “be a neighbor” and step forward if they knew anything about the perpetrators."
“You can talk about the weather but the weather didn’t pull the trigger,” Mr. Emanuel said. “You can talk about jobs, and they count, but in parts of the city where there aren’t jobs, people did not pull the trigger."
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.1  
  Sources: 7  
  Relevant (Beta): 53%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Perhaps it does change the dynamic, but it's nonetheless valid. I believe we should consider the ramifications of actions before we promote them."
Why shouldn't those who commit crimes with their weapons, think ahead of time, about the lives of those, that they go about changing through the illegaI actions of using a weapon to commit their crimes with?
For how many years and decades has weapons violance been going on for now?
Look at it this way, you express these words: "I believe we should consider the ramifications of actions before we promote them."
And then some of the citizens in the United States, who legally had a weapon, but then, used that weapon to commit a crime with, why shouldn't they have heeded your very words, and then created ramifications of their own, by hurting innocent people with their weapons?
What it comes down to is this, you have your rationalization, in regards to weapons and the second amendment?
And the legal weapons owners, who went about breaking the law, and abused their right to bear arms, apparently have a rationalization different from yours?
So your values in regards to the second amendment, became secondary to the other weapons owner, who broke the law, by committing a crime or crimes by using their weapons?
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.98  
  Sources: 8  
  Relevant (Beta): 54%  
  Learn More About Debra
Look at it this way, you express these words: "I believe we should consider the ramifications of actions before we promote them."
And then some of the citizens in the United States, who legally had a weapon, but then, used that weapon to commit a crime with, why shouldn't they have heeded your very words, and then created ramifications of their own, by hurting innocent people with their weapons?
What it comes down to is this, you have your rationalization, in regards to weapons and the second amendment?
And the legal weapons owners, who went about breaking the law, and abused their right to bear arms, apparently have a rationalization different from yours?
So your values in regards to the second amendment, became secondary to the other weapons owner, who broke the law, by committing a crime or crimes by using their weapons?
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
"I see; so you view rights as being contingent on whether the government can envision them being abused in some way. If rights can be abused in some way, the government can set up all kinds of hurdles and restrictions to deny citizens their ability to avail themselves of those rights. Is that how that works? All men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights that can be restricted or denied by the government on a whim, Constitution be damned? You really don't see the problem here???"
Let me make a guess, based upon, your above words?
You love your weapons, just like some drug users love their weed, and so on, and so on, right?
  Considerate: 55%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
I think this applies as well "But for" Rule
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 71%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.66  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 57%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Also, Mexico has gun control laws. Must I mention Acapulco and Los Cabos? They make Chicago look like a safe haven.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p6M-VgXHwwdpJarhyQYapBz-kRc6FrgdOLFAd3IfYz8/edit
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 39%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 55%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p6M-VgXHwwdpJarhyQYapBz-kRc6FrgdOLFAd3IfYz8/edit
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 57%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 73%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
What I'm saying is that every gun owner who is mentally fit,has no drug problem and has no criminal records can of course keep their gun,people who are a danger to themselves and to society should not have a gun.
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Because of your rhetoric:
"And if I were to guess based on your comments, you love an all-powerful police state. Rights? What are those? There are no such things, there is only what the government permits when the government allows it. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. All Hail Big Brother!!
Do you entitle yourself to making such comments, because you're a weapons owner, and you're borrowing the second amendment as a platform maker, and using it apparently as your soapbox?
I'm pro community, and pro law, pro family, pro education, and pro United States of America.
(When a weapons owner, goes home, and turns their weapon on their own family, or turns their weapon on a building filled with strangers..)
What is your probable position on the above?
Do you maybe view the two above criminal situations as being pro family, or pro community?
(Is anyone/ big brother,) as we have this debate, trying to take your weapons away from you?
But at the same time, offenders with weapons, do not have the right to murder their or another's family with their weapons do they?
But you cry foul when someone says gun control?
Any human being before committing a crime with a weapon, should have some basic principled respect for themselves, and the others who are in the same communities with them.
Here's the ugly problem, offenders have used weapons to kill innocent people with, and there are weapons owners who are abiding by the law.
Well guess what, the public/society/ and communities across have been placed in between the offenders who use weapons illegally to commit their crimes with, and the law abiding weapons owners.
The above is how I view the 300 million plus firearms in the United States, in comparison to the 325 million US citizens.
And roughly 900,000 police officers in the United States, nationwide have been placed in between the law abiding weapons owners, and the offenders who use their weapons to commit their crimes with.
  Considerate: 58%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Can you point out specifically, what below points of view, that you view as a fallacy?
Because of your rhetoric:
"And if I were to guess based on your comments, you love an all-powerful police state. Rights? What are those? There are no such things, there is only what the government permits when the government allows it. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. All Hail Big Brother!!
Do you entitle yourself to making such comments, because you're a weapons owner, and you're borrowing the second amendment as a platform maker, and using it apparently as your soapbox?
I'm pro community, pro law, pro family, pro education, and pro United States of America.
(When a weapons owner, goes home, and turns their weapon on their own family, or turns their weapon on a building filled with strangers..)
What is your probable position on the above?
Do you maybe view the two above criminal situations as being pro family, or pro community?
(Is anyone/ big brother,) as we have this debate, trying to take your weapons away from you?
But at the same time, offenders with weapons, do not have the right to murder their or another's family with their weapons do they?
But you cry foul when someone says gun control?
Any human being before committing a crime with a weapon, should have some basic principled respect for themselves, and the others who are in the same communities with them.
Here's the ugly problem, offenders have used weapons to kill innocent people with, and there are weapons owners who are abiding by the law.
Well guess what, the public/society/ and communities across have been placed in between the offenders who use weapons illegally to commit their crimes with, and the law abiding weapons owners.
The above is how I view the 300 million plus firearms in the United States, in comparison to the 325 million US citizens.
And roughly 900,000 police officers in the United States, nationwide have been placed in between the law abiding weapons owners, and the offenders who use their weapons to commit their crimes with.
Are you maybe a weapons owner as well Zombieguy1987?
  Considerate: 60%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.46  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
@TTKDB people...
He knows nothing about reality and/or history!
Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news
Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 57%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
#2 is already that way
#3 totally absurd
#4 some states have an even longer wait period, which does absolutely nothing since criminals don't follow laws
clearly you know very little on the subject, the waiting period pretty much gave that away. You don't understand the bill of rights and constitution that the U.S. has, not enough to really engage in this topic. Please do more research and educate yourself a lot more on these topics.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
"But it seems you support gun control."
Just as I stated before: I'm pro community, pro law, pro family, pro education, and pro United States of America.
Now you tell me, how did you derive from the above, that I somehow support gun control?
I support the second amendment.
And I also support the millions of people in the United States, who want to enjoy life, without an offender illegally using a weapon to commit a crime against those same millions of people.
And I support the March For Our Lives members as well.
And I support those members, fighting for the school kids across the country. (I saw the March, I heard the various speakers, saw the various news vans that were covering the March from the staging areas. And I saw plenty of the protest posters, and watched the protesters carrying their protest posters down the street.)
I'm trying to express to you the various points of view, that have encompassed my education:
On the second amendment, the law abiding weapons owners, and the weapons owners, who broke the law, and used their weapons to commit their crimes with.
And how that illegal weapons violance has affected, the millions of people across the country.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 59%  
  Learn More About Debra
The biggest effect of requiring a psychological evaluation prior to a weapons purchase would be to dissuade people from seeking help when they need it because they're worried about losing their property and their rights.
The only law-abiding weapons owners who have killed people were those who used their weapons in self-defense. This happens hundreds of thousands to millions of times per year. Gun control won't stop criminal misuse of firearms, but it will impede law-abiding gun owners from being able to defend themselves and others. Feel free to explain how prohibiting people from being able to defend themselves is pro community, pro law, pro family, pro education, or pro United States of America.
  Considerate: 65%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.42  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Here's another ugly problem; none of the suggestions you made will stop offenders from using weapons to kill innocent people."
Why don't you take your words and tell it to the families who have had family members murdered by the offenders you're talking about?
Here you go, reach out to the family talked about in this current Nationwide story from Texas?
https://amp-cnn-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/12/31/us/texas-killing/index.html?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQECAFYAQ==#referrer=https://www.google.com&amp_tf=From %1$s&ampshare=https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/31/us/texas-killing/index.html
Some excerpts from the story:
"Texas dad pleads for help in finding gunman who killed 7-year-old girl"
"They came through my window, broke my glass, and hit me in my arm," she told the station from her hospital bed.
Washington said: "He sped off in front of us and stopped, and still continued to fire at us."
"It was not fair. He intentionally killed my child for no reason. He didn't even know her. He didn't even know who she was," she said."
See how the second amendment that you cherish, just got treated by the suspect talked about in the news story?
Isn't it tragic, when the very laws making murder illegal gets treated like trash?
When an offender wants to treat the very community that they just affected by the their gun violence like trash?
Treating the freedom of choice in the United States like trash?
And the firearm that they used to commit their crime with, the weapon itself, was treated like trash as well?
How does the above make you feel CYDdharta?
How does that news story make you feel?
It's sickinly sad that another family has been affected by gun violance isn't it?
"Gun control won't stop criminal misuse of firearms, but it will impede law-abiding gun owners from being able to defend themselves and others. Feel free to explain how prohibiting people from being able to defend themselves is pro community, pro law, pro family, pro education, or pro United States of America."
Why don't you take the above statement, and tell it that same Texas family?
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.44  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 55%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.68  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Now how about explaining why you love and promote the police state and want to deter gun owners and potential gun owners from trying to get medical help?"
Point out to me, where I've expressed any police state dialogue?
Here's my position:
I'm pro community, pro second amendment, pro law, pro family, pro education, and pro United States of America.
What is your position?
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
And you're stalling CYDdharta.
You can have a seat behind your soapbox, and parade these words before the audience to this forum all you want:
"You keep saying that, but you have yet to explain how denying people their rights is pro community, pro second amendment, pro law, pro family, pro education, or pro United States of America. It is, however, pro police state."
What's your position?
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
What national TV news media outlets, like ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, PBS, WHRO, or maybe even NPR?
Has stated in any of it's news media outlet coverage, say in the last 6 months, about this from you?
That the "United States of America. It is, however, pro police state."
Where's your evidence to support your statement?
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra