The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Proposals on how to tackle the issue of gun related crime
in United States
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
A Tyranny in governing is not restricted to government itself, the process which is to be created by a creator to be cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control is applied to government as lack of address in legislation. The applied actions of a single person as well can be a tyrannical form of governing, rape and mass shootings are the noted criminal legal precedent in truth.
The precedent shared as united state in civil and criminal right is described as truth, whole truth, and nothing but truth. A whole truth is the person who refuses to own a gun is equally in sharing the burden of illegal application of lethal force. They offer no resistance as equally to means to end multiple victims. The negligence of gun ownership is an open basic principle and applies to refusal to own a gun as independent.
The truth is a ballistic shield is creating equality between two or more types of negligence to establish a common defense which is shared between united state in levels of defense. The stop of Tyranny imposed by a shooter by lethal force already under way has three opinions. Let the shooting continue and wait for help, allow self-preservation by equal application of force, and prepare for an aggressive defensive end to conflict.
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.2  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: whole truth    improbable event of Government Tyranny   arbitrary use of power   open basic principle  
  Relevant (Beta): 37%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 70%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: government tyranny    better start   exact amount of firepower   concern  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.06  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: automatic long guns    federal fire arms   automatic weapons   destructive weapons  
  Relevant (Beta): 64%  
  Learn More About Debra
The Weird Reason Why Gun Ownership in America Is at Its Lowest Point Since the 1970s The Weird Reason Why Gun Ownership in America Is at Its Lowest Point Since the 1970s Despite a recent uptick in gun sales, the percentage of U.S. households that own guns is at its lowest level in almost four decades, a new poll has found.
A recent CBS News poll found that 36% of adults either personally own a firearm or live with someone who does–the lowest level since 1978. That’s 10% lower than gun ownership rates in 2012 and 17 points lower than 1994’s high of 53%. Despite a recent uptick in gun sales, the percentage of U.S. households that own guns is at its lowest level in almost four decades, a new poll has found.
A recent CBS News poll found that 36% of adults either personally own a firearm or live with someone who does–the lowest level since 1978. That’s 10% lower than gun ownership rates in 2012 and 17 points lower than 1994’s high of 53%.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.78  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Lowest Point    Gun Ownership   lowest level   recent uptick  
  Relevant (Beta): 39%  
  Learn More About Debra
@CYDdharta
@billbatard
One of the problems in the United States, is with the apparent tyranny of the career criminals, and the offenders, who committed their crimes with their illegal guns, along with the other objects that they used to assault, hurt, maim, cripple, or killed their innocent victim's with?
Still no signs of any protesters, who could take to any of the public streets, across the country, to publicly protest the crimes, that the career criminals, offenders, and the first time offenders, have been committing for days, weeks, months, and decades now in the United States?
@ZeusAres42
@CYDdharta
@billbatard
I went channel surfing, and there isn't a small group of protesters, or 2 million plus protesters, getting any type of nationwide news media outlet coverage, for protesting the tyrannical crimes that have been getting committed by the career criminals, or the offenders, for a long time now?
- exercising power in a cruel or arbitrary way."
Or, maybe, in, a sense, some don't view the crimes, that some commit with their illegal guns, or their other weapons of choice, as they, by apparently exercising their own individualized power over another, with an illegal gun, or their own weapons of choice in their own cruel ways?Or, maybe, in a sense, some don't view the crimes, of the criminals, or the offenders, as in, a sense, being oppressive, dictatorial, despotic, autocratic, repressive, fascistic, tyrannous, absolute, or totalitarian, with their illegal uses, of their guns, knives, baseball bats, clubs, vehicles, and or with their probable uses of their domestic abuse, and violence tendencies?
I guess that's why, maybe seeing a group, or 2 million plus protesters, might choose protesting some of the police officers, over maybe protesting, the career criminals, the offenders, and the first time offenders, instead, and holding them responsible for the crimes that they've been committing for days, weeks, months, and years now, against the rest of the public as a whole?
  Considerate: 65%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 40%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 60%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Have you got anything that is actually on topic and follows on from what I said in reference to government tyranny?
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 51%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Afghans    government tyranny   topic   reference  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 33%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: assault weapons    US Military   mere handguns   things  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.78  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 41%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: ZeusAres42    statement   topic   point  
  Relevant (Beta): 75%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: improbable event.The Taliban    initial statement   bunch of guys   exact amount of firepower  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 69%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.3  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: ability of gun enthusiasts    long guns   automatic self loading   dangerous weapons  
  Relevant (Beta): 17%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 65%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.88  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: ability of gun enthusiasts    long guns   automatic self loading   dangerous weapons  
  Relevant (Beta): 29%  
  Learn More About Debra
The guns are mostly needed only to start the chain reaction. The US military is very likely to side with the rebels in case the cause is just. But if people have no guns, then there is nothing to start. That is why in most nations rebellions are initiated by rogue groups within the army, rather than common citizens. And that is why those coups tend to end with a fresh military dictatorship installed. You do not want that, trust me.
  Considerate: 58%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: entire nation    US Military   them.The guns   assault weapons  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
"require a federal fire arms license for all hand guns and semi automatic long guns"
Being that there are 393 million guns in the United States, already, and millions of them have their serial numbers already erased from the very frames of those guns, and are already in circulation by the illegal gun seller, and the criminals, and offenders, are illegally buying them up, when made available to them at their individual whims?
Your license idea, doesn't do those millions of illegal guns, any good, because they have already been sold, and are off and running with the career criminals, and offenders who have already bought them up.
  Considerate: 71%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Some would prefer the 2nd Amendment unchanged, and left alone as is.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 41%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: 2nd Amendment         
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Thank you for giving me at least a somewhat reasonable response.
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: US military    idea of Government Tyranny   US government   year track record  
  Relevant (Beta): 75%  
  Learn More About Debra
One of the problems in the United States, is with the apparent tyranny of the career criminals, and the offenders, who committed their crimes with their illegal guns, along with the other objects that they used to assault, hurt, maim, cripple, or killed their innocent victim's with?
Still no signs of any protesters, who could take to any of the public streets, across the country, to publicly protest the crimes, that the career criminals, offenders, and the first time offenders, have been committing for days, weeks, months, and decades now in the United States?
I went channel surfing, and there isn't a small group of protesters, or 2 million plus protesters, getting any type of nationwide news media outlet coverage, for protesting the tyrannical crimes that have been getting committed by the career criminals, or the offenders, for a long time now?
- exercising power in a cruel or arbitrary way."
Or, maybe, in, a sense, some don't view the crimes, that some commit with their illegal guns, or their other weapons of choice, as they, by apparently exercising their own individualized power over another, with an illegal gun, or their own weapons of choice in their own cruel ways?Or, maybe, in a sense, some don't view the crimes, of the criminals, or the offenders, as in, a sense, being oppressive, dictatorial, despotic, autocratic, repressive, fascistic, tyrannous, absolute, or totalitarian, with their illegal uses, of their guns, knives, baseball bats, clubs, vehicles, and or with their probable uses of their domestic abuse, and violence tendencies?
I guess that's why, maybe seeing a group, or 2 million plus protesters, might choose protesting some of the police officers, over maybe protesting, the career criminals, the offenders, and the first time offenders, instead, and holding them responsible for the crimes that they've been committing for days, weeks, months, and years now, against the rest of the public as a whole?
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 43%  
  Learn More About Debra
“I went channel surfing, and there isn't a small group of protesters”
The biggest tyrannical protest is civil action for a woman running for President as a united state. It is a person whim without constitutional merit as its reason. Discrimination is the justification for ignoring basic principle as assuming a civil liberty on public plagiarism instead.
Second large tyrannical example is the assumption of incorporation made by same gender couple under a plagiarism of Marriage by members of the same sex who are either distinctly Binivir or UnosMulier public corporations.
Third is pregnancy abortion as it is in basic principle an admission of a crime placing a self-incrimination as a united state.
In basic principle refusing to assume an equal burden of lethal force is an exercise in power in a cruel or arbitrary way. “I do not need to be made unhappy by allowing a person to force me into shooting them. By not owning a gun I will always be able to blame some-one else for a shooting.” This is a truth that never makes it to debate.
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: basic principle    pregnancy abortion   Second large tyrannical example   admission of a crime  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
If some of the public isnt taking to the very streets in this country to publicly protest, (the non race on race murders, and the race on race murders,) that happen everyday in a country where 393 million guns are apparently owned by the law abiding citizens, along with (being illegally owned by some of the career criminals, and the offenders, which to me, is its own brand of tyranny?
(Reiterating my previous points, because the police get protested, more than the career criminals, and the offenders do, because of the murders that the career criminals, and offenders have committed, against the public as a whole, and apparently not many, if any want to publicly hold those career criminals, or the offenders, publicly responsible for the gun violence brutality crimes, against their victims, but some of the police get protested, as a way to hold them accountable, or responsible for their actions?
Because maybe some of the public themselves, are exercising some of their own forms of "pocket tyranny," by how they choose to treat the public as a whole?
Via how some go about protesting "others," or how some maybe go about committing their crimes?)
- exercising power in a cruel or arbitrary way."
Or, maybe, in, a sense, some don't view the crimes, that some commit with their illegal guns, or their other weapons of choice, as they, by apparently exercising their own individualized power over another, with an illegal gun, or their own weapons of choice in their own cruel ways?Or, maybe, in a sense, some don't view the crimes, of the criminals, or the offenders, as in, a sense, being oppressive, dictatorial, despotic, autocratic, repressive, fascistic, tyrannous, absolute, or totalitarian, with their illegal uses, of their guns, knives, baseball bats, clubs, vehicles, and or with their probable uses of their domestic abuse, and violence tendencies?
I guess that's why, maybe seeing a group, or 2 million plus protesters, might choose protesting some of the police officers, over maybe protesting, the career criminals, the offenders, and the first time offenders, instead, and holding them responsible for the crimes that they've been committing for days, weeks, months, and years now, against the rest of the public as a whole?
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
Public protest is a type of expressed grievance.
Tyrannical exercising a power in a cruel or arbitrary way. The question for truth here is if the crime is murder, is it then arbitrary to have an additional law in place to charge after that whole truth. The criminal should not be using any basic object as a weapon period. A gun law is a whim or choice which negates any United state of constitutional wrong as reason. A criminal buying a weapon is a crime.
As we are drifting off topic let me refocus our discussion to a constitutional application of truth as an addition to whole truth in background checks. We the people want to know when and if a criminal is in a gun shop to buy a gun. Basic principle. Instead of having a check for a background of criminal conviction at the store why is the background check not done at a state Multivehicle, there any state record can be describing a constitutional disqualification on the State Identification or license. A person is then Constitutional qualified to make this purchase or is not qualified.
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: background checks    constitutional application of truth   state Multivehicle   state record  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
You are entitled to your individual points of view.
While some of the public, who is basically refusing to protest the crimes, committed by the non race on race criminals, and offenders?
And to protest, the crimes, committed, by the race on race criminals, and offenders, as well?
Those non protesters, not protesting those crimes, is just as educational as those protesters who choose to protest some of the Police Officer, involved shootings instead?
As I expressed before, It's sadistally sad how these "pocket tyrannical individuals" who continue to oppress, dictate, or repress the other citizens around them, through their criminal, or offender ways?
Instead of putting up with, or living with these individuals?
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Can you please elaborate as to why you think this is absurd and how you are so convinced that everyone else thinks this is beyond absurd? Or is this just the way feel in response to what you read; if it is the latter then that is your opinion and that's fine. "
unless someone has actually committed a crime and as a result it is determined the individual is too dangerous to own guns, this idea of pre judging and attempting to determine if someone COULD be potentially dangerous in the future is making a determination of guilt w/o due process. If you've never seen the movie "Minority Report" I would suggest you watch it, it's not bad but the other all theme is interesting imo.
But anyway what criteria would be used? Having government mandated diagnosing for people to exercise their rights very Orwellying. This is not a power that should be given to the government.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 29%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: law         
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: shootings    law   crime   criminals  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.34  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: second amendment    national gaurd   guns   gun  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: lives of the innocents    second amendment   toys   right of The People  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
How are you making an argument based on the premise, of a science fiction movie, about a made up hypothetical situation?
"unless someone has actually committed a crime and as a result it is determined the individual is too dangerous to own guns, this idea of pre judging and attempting to determine if someone COULD be potentially dangerous in the future is making a determination of guilt w/o due process. If you've never seen the movie "Minority Report" I would suggest you watch it, it's not bad but the other all theme is interesting imo.
But anyway what criteria would be used? Having government mandated diagnosing for people to exercise their rights very Orwellying. This is not a power that should be given to the government."
To make your argument?
Criminals and offenders, have been judging their individual victims with their illegally purchased guns for how many decades now?
Via murder, sexual assaults, armed robberies, carjackings, kidnappings, abductions, domestic abuse, and violence situations, and the mass shooters, and their mass shootings gun violence brutality?
There were gangs, and mobsters back in the day using submachine guns, the same apparent, submachine guns, that were used in WW2?
It's mind boggling, how individuals come up with some of their individual arguments?
In the very country that has more guns, than any other country has?
In the very country, that has more guns, that are outnumbering, its very own citizens?
393 million guns, with the roughly 900,000 Police Officers in the middle, along with the rest of the US citizens, who don't maybe own a gun, or a collection of guns, in comparison to the various numbers of guns, with their serial numbers missing, that was sold by an illegal gun dealer, and is now illegally in the hands of the criminals, and offenders?
Because maybe their illegal guns, maybe means more to the criminals, and the offenders, than the rest of the humanity means to the criminal, or the offender?
While the pro gun individuals, use the 2nd Amendment to protect, the very guns, that they own, and utilize their pro gun talking points, to defend their view of the 2nd Amendment, and their individual gun collections as well?
While the law abiding citizens, and the Police Officers in general, get to deal with the illegal gun toting criminal, or offender, who wants to commit crimes against their next probable victims?
While some of the Police Officers, deal with the various citizens, or criminals, or offenders, who go about balking, or refuse to do as a Police Officer, or Officers, instructors the various citizens, or criminals, or offenders to do, after they have maybe committed a crime, and the Police Officer, or Officers, are trying to get a scene figured out, after a crime, has happened, or was occurring?
Isn't it tragic, and sad, how guns in general are affecting the United States as whole, because some are maybe enabling, and perpetuating those illegal actions to be able to occur, because of how they view the sale and purchase of an illegal weapon, by maybe who those illegal gun, or guns, are being sold to?
So who is maybe more culpable, the illegal gun dealer, or the way the 2nd Amendment is written in its current form?
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
@CYDdharta
How does that hold any truth shootings as a united state in not all a crime. Law is governing that directs a person can not train independently on skill without breaking the law making them criminal for wanting to hold the constitutions common defense from civil burdens of lethal force.
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.44  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: law    common defense   person   skill  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
@TKDB
No TKDB the point of view it is a truth, looking for whole truth add if you can please. A background check is intrusive, we are on the topic of gun negligence and death. This sets a goal for whole truth in the collecting of nothing but truth, part of this collection is that a person who does not hold the burden of lethal force equally becomes negligent in events of public mass shootings.
This burden needs to be addressed to set an equality between all people armed with a gun and unarmed. There is an undertone of taxation without representation by means of insurance settlements at work in the background of this discussion. Much like those in Medicine. Returning fire stops incoming fire the other option is to draw fire away from as many people as possible. This basic principle and legal precedent often now reflects a choice of civil public action, even though more than likely is hindered by legally obstacles. This negligence is separated by judicial separation in representation of public mass shootings in many settlements of issues, at the least in many criminal proceedings if not both civil and criminal. Developing a system of governing by vote that democratically shifts the burden of lethal force to one side is wrong.
One: ballistic shield addresses this inequality in part by saying okay there is no need for only actions with a gun now be handled by those with guns. Equally here is the public chance ballistic shield. There is a chance for those who chose to offer means of drawling fire or escape equally to do so.
Two: adding a qualification to the drivers licensing and state I.D. process creates a more efficient method of identification to something that has an all-around efficient result is solving multiple issue against united state constitutional states of union. The union is between basic principle and legal finding and how it effects the common defense to a general welfare.
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.48  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: united state    basic principle   fire stops   constitutional states of union  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra
You're entitled to your opinion.
And the below is the Truth, that I see, that has been plaguing, the public, law enforcement, and the laws of this country, when it comes to the gun violence brutality crimes, committed by tbe career criminals, and the offenders, and the actions, of the illegal gun dealer, for decades now?:
Criminals and offenders, have been judging their individual victims with their illegally purchased guns for how many decades now?
Via murder, sexual assaults, armed robberies, carjackings, kidnappings, abductions, domestic abuse, and violence situations, and the mass shooters, and their mass shootings gun violence brutality?
There were gangs, and mobsters back in the day using submachine guns, the same apparent, submachine guns, that were used in WW2?
It's mind boggling, how individuals come up with some of their individual arguments?
In the very country that has more guns, than any other country has?
In the very country, that has more guns, that are outnumbering, its very own citizens?
393 million guns, with the roughly 900,000 Police Officers in the middle, along with the rest of the US citizens, who don't maybe own a gun, or a collection of guns, in comparison to the various numbers of guns, with their serial numbers missing, that was sold by an illegal gun dealer, and is now illegally in the hands of the criminals, and offenders?
Because maybe their illegal guns, maybe means more to the criminals, and the offenders, than the rest of the humanity means to the criminal, or the offender?
While the pro gun individuals, use the 2nd Amendment to protect, the very guns, that they own, and utilize their pro gun talking points, to defend their view of the 2nd Amendment, and their individual gun collections as well?
While the law abiding citizens, and the Police Officers in general, get to deal with the illegal gun toting criminal, or offender, who wants to commit crimes against their next probable victims?
While some of the Police Officers, deal with the various citizens, or criminals, or offenders, who go about balking, or refuse to do as a Police Officer, or Officers, instructors the various citizens, or criminals, or offenders to do, after they have maybe committed a crime, and the Police Officer, or Officers, are trying to get a scene figured out, after a crime, has happened, or was occurring?
Isn't it tragic, and sad, how guns in general are affecting the United States as whole, because some are maybe enabling, and perpetuating those illegal actions to be able to occur, because of how they view the sale and purchase of an illegal weapon, by maybe who those illegal gun, or guns, are being sold to?
So who is maybe more culpable, the illegal gun dealer, or the way the 2nd Amendment is written in its current form?
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: gun violence brutality crimes    submachine guns   illegal gun dealer   sexual assaults  
  Relevant (Beta): 69%  
  Learn More About Debra
What about the rights of the victims, who the criminals, and offenders took away from their victims, via their gun violence brutality crimes?
Is your desire to own a gun via the 2nd Amendment, maybe more important than the rights, of the millions of the citizens in the United States who didn't deserve to be victimized by the criminals, and or the offenders, with their illegally owned guns, by having crimes committed by those same criminals, and offenders?
What are your words of defense for them?
Maybe go purchase, a gun?
What if those citizens, don't maintain, the same pro gun owning philosophy that you've engrained yourself with?
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: gun violence brutality crimes    rights of the victims   United States   2nd Amendment  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
I am pro gun. And the real question isn't are my 2nd amendment rights more important than the rights of other citizens. But rather, Why are my 2nd amendment rights important to the rights of others?
If someone wants to shoot up a place no law is going to stop them from going and getting an illegal gun. Laws don't stop addicts from getting drugs. And from my experience with the law enforcement guns are just as easy to get as things like crack, cocaine and meth.
But when access to sophisticated firearms are easily accessible and legal then both the respectful citizen and the insane are going to have that gun. When if it was illegal the insane would only have it because laws don't matter to them.
The real answer to stopping gun related crime is freeing up the laws on firearms for people above 18 and publicizing that we are doing so everywhere. (On school grounds only staff carry)(And fully automatic firearms and combative explosives should be illegal). The reason I say we need to publicize this is because as we saw with the theater shooter he was going theater to theater shooting everyone. But he didn't stop at the theater that publicized that is was pro gun. So we free up the laws crime will decrease and if something does happen there will be more people willing and able to stop it.
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: real question    school grounds   2nd amendment rights   pro gun  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
TKDB
You are moving around in many directions and when answered with truth people find any discussion hard to follow. A truth, the police officer cannot be in the middle as they are sworn to serve and protect the United States Constitution by the placement of their position in the public. Meaning the truth is self-evident and need not be written. Police officers are always on the side of United States Constitution not law enforcement. The fact as a group we are unwilling to share law enforcement in the general public takes away any chance of forming a united state around it. This is part of the basic principle why a lawyer is licensed to fabricate justice by law enforcement. The road to whole truth is long and winding with many turns and dead ends. There is a basic separation in constitutional order at that many points.
Truth guns can easily be manufactured without serial numbers since the 1800. A person has a United States Constitutional right in gun ownership, even if they have been falsely instructed otherwise or know otherwise. The 2nd Amendment is a voice in grievance to act as one united state without being labeled a militia specifically. An encompasses truth of its own merits to gun ownership. This includes recreationally shooting for relaxation, shooting for mathematics education, competitive shooting, undertaking of common civil legal defense in use of lethal force for a military and police force, survival shooting, and other truths not listed.
Here is a basic truth. Urinating can create dysentery and we can die. We do not make drinking juice and soda illegal as it increases the need to urinate. We do not make drinking water illegal as it will make us sick and kill us. We reduce the cause of dysentery. Basic truth we need a gun to live if not for any other reason than a person can simply just kill us with their hand. Making hands illegal does not change the truth about the use of hands by anyone, those hands can still be used to kill.
Basic principle people don’t stop bullets ballistic shields abort a shooting.
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: basic separation    truth people   Basic principle people   basic truth  
  Relevant (Beta): 53%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: gun violence brutality crimes    rights of the victims   United States   words of defense  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Yes, my right to own a gun is more important than other peoples' desires to not be victimized. My right is spelled out in the Constitution. There is no right not to be victimized."
Maybe with the way the 2nd Amendment is written, it's a probable failure of words, when it comes to the written words of the Civil Rights of the United States?
And those criminals, and offenders, who have killed, kids, parents, single adults, and senior citizens alike, along with the gun illegal gun street dealers, aren't they maybe in violation of their victims civil rights, being that they victimized their innocent victims, via the illegal use of their illegal guns, yes or no?
Do you have a single quote, where the 2nd Amendment, is able to defend the civil rights, of those that don't own guns, like you legally own, and the criminals, and offenders, illegally own?
Maybe go purchase, a gun?
"Sage advice. If they don't want to protect themselves, they're free to be victims."
Who are you, to maybe tell, the people who don't own a gun, how to live their lives from the perception of your individual pro gun stance?
You have given me an unprecedented education, on how a gun owner, may view the public, through the very perception of their individual pro gun mindset?
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
You are entitled to your individual opinion, I wish you a good day sir.
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 24%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: individual opinion    good day sir      
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
From Wikipedia:
"Since the Constitution came into force in 1789, it has been amended 27 times, including an amendment to repeal a previous one,[4] in order to meet the needs of a nation that has profoundly changed since the eighteenth century.[5] In general, the first ten amendments, known collectively as the Bill of Rights, offer specific protections of individual liberty and justice and place restrictions on the powers of government.[6][7] The majority of the seventeen later amendments expand individual civil rights protections. Others address issues related to federal authority or modify government processes and procedures. Amendments to the United States Constitution, unlike ones made to many constitutions worldwide, are appended to the document. All four pages[8] of the original U.S. Constitution are written on parchment.[9]
According to the United States Senate: "The Constitution's first three words—We the People—affirm that the government of the United States exists to serve its citizens. For over two centuries the Constitution has remained in force because its framers wisely separated and balanced governmental powers to safeguard the interests of majority rule and minority rights, of liberty and equality, and of the federal and state governments."[5]
The first permanent constitution of its kind,[a]adopted by the people's representatives for an expansive nation, it is interpreted, supplemented, and implemented by a large body of constitutional law, and has influenced the constitutions of other nations."
I think that the "Second Amendment," should be amended, "in order to meet the needs of a nation, that has profoundly changed since the eighteenth century."
The U.S. Constitution has been amended 27 times, including an amendment to repeal a previous one.
  Considerate: 96%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.84  
  Sources: 14  
  Relevant (Beta): 41%  
  Learn More About Debra
First off for your future references don't use Wikipedia it isn't a trusted source. I'm not saying what is written is fallacy I'm just saying Wikipedia isn't the best source.
Second off a majority of our founding fathers were scholars of their time so there isn't a failure of words, especially because they had to go back several times to revise the bill of rights so as to get all the states on board. They put in the 2nd amendment to protect the victims so as not to see our individuals or our country as a whole fall victim to an oppressor because the oppressor had access to tools of safety that they did not. So when someone is giving up their right to bear arms they are willing subjecting themselves to the oppressors. Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Third off as you said the criminals tend to illegally on their weapons so why would more laws stop them, it won't, it only makes the law abiding citizen more easily victimized.
Lastly, we are not telling them how to live their lives, though we may believe it is an illogical choice to not practice their second amendment right it is their right to do so. The only thing we insist on is that they don't try and make laws that restrict our second amendment right, because in doing this they are making us more vulnerable to victimization.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 57%  
  Learn More About Debra
"The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms and was adopted on December 15, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights.[1][2][3][4]
In the 2008 Heller decision, the Supreme Courtaffirmed for the first time that the right belongs to individuals, exclusively for self-defense in the home,[5][6][7][8] while also including, as dicta, that the right is not unlimited and does not preclude the existence of certain long-standing prohibitions such as those forbidding "the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill" or restrictions on "the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons."[9][10]State and local governments are limited to the same extent as the federal government from infringing this right.[11]
The Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms in English common lawand was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689. Sir William Blackstone described this right as an auxiliary right, supporting the natural rights of self-defense and resistance to oppression, and the civic duty to act in concert in defense of the state.[12] "
And I do not see one visible instance, where the Second Amendment, was written as to defend the Bill of Rights of the unarmed citizens, unlike the armed citizens?
So, it would appear to be a failure on an amendment to protect, the overall Bill of Rights, or the civil rights of those citizens who don't lawfully own a gun, like the lawful gun owners do?
So please refrain, from framing the (unarmed citizens, as possible future victims,) because they failed to arm themselves with a gun, like the lawful gun owners have done, and then to in a sense chastize them, from the gun owners perspective, for not arming themselves?
Thus allowing themselves to become victimized by the illegal gun toting criminal, or offender, because some citizens can be viewed that way by a lawful gun owner?
One could likely view that kind of a tone, as a patronizing tone, towards the unarmed citizens, by a gun owning citizen?
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.22  
  Sources: 26  
  Relevant (Beta): 29%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Who are you, to maybe tell, the people who own a gun, how to live their lives from the perception of your individual anti gun stance?"
Show me one instance, where I told you how to live your life, because you own a weapon?
I'm pro Second Amendment.
I'm pro Bill of Rights.
I'm also pro kids, pro parents, pro single individuals, and pro senior citizens, because some of whom, who have been shot, hurt, maimed, crippled, or killed by a lawful gun owner, and some of the criminals, and the offenders, who used their guns, to kill some of their victims with?
Day after day, week after week, month after month, and year after year without fail.
Because the Second Amendment, as its currently written, seems to maybe in a sense, not address the Bill of Rights, when it comes to addressing those rights violations, in the face of the very laws that makes those crimes illegal?
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
I'm also pro kids, pro parents, pro single individuals, and pro senior citizens, because some of whom, who have been shot, hurt, maimed, crippled, or killed by a lawful gun owner, and some of the criminals, and the offenders, who used their guns, to kill some of their victims with?
The guns didn't shoot them the person did.
The failure to amend the Second Amendment, is a tragic reality, that the police officers, and the rest of the public gets to live with, because of the unlawful uses of both the legal guns, and illegal guns. Changing the second amendment to make it stricter will won't stop the use illegal guns. It won't effect the amount of gun violence. it will increase the amount of illegal gun use.
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: lawful gun owner    Second Amendment   pro kids   single individuals  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
"The guns didn't shoot them the person did."
Yes, the guns, did shoot the victims, because the criminals, or offenders used their guns to commit their crimes with.
Ballistics, and forensics, are used to prove that.
"Changing the second amendment to make it stricter will won't stop the use illegal guns. It won't effect the amount of gun violence. it will increase the amount of illegal gun use."
No, not with a country that has more guns, than it has citizens in it?
393 million guns, to 325 million U.S. citizens.
We're being endangered by some, who apparently self value their gun, or guns, more than they fail to value some of the very humanity, that is pretty much around all of us at one time of another, during our daily lives?
The Second Amendment should be changed, to reflect the troubled modern day and age that we are all being affected by via the gun violence brutality crimes.
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: pro kids    lawful gun owner   single individuals   senior citizens  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
You obviously you aren't hearing us. Because you strip parts of our arguments down to a place where by themselves they are weak but you need to take our arguments as a whole. If you wish to bring up points that have been previously brought to the light look back on our arguments and you will find where we addressed them. Thank you and good day.
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: nbsp    parts of our arguments   points   light look  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
"You obviously like to hear yourself. You are refusing to hear anyone's side. Because you strip parts of our arguments down to a place where by themselves they are weak but you need to take our arguments as a whole. If you wish to bring up points that have been previously brought to the light look back on our arguments and you will find where we addressed them. Thank you and good day."
I went to the March For Our Lives rally in D.C. last year.
And I watched and listened to some of the same students who survived a murdering mass shooters gun violence brutality that had their lives changed forever, and the families lives forever, because a human with a gun, killed some of the students, and teachers who were at their school.
They protested gun violence in real life, and told a quarter of a million people who went to the rally how they felt, how they were affected by the mass shooters gun violence brutality, and to inform, and educate those with open minds, and hearts, to hear their words, without judgement or condemnation, from those who didn't agree with them protesting gun violence in public, in D.C.?
The news has been talking about the various mass shooters gun violence brutality, like this individual shooter, Charles Whitman, who committed his crime, in Texas?
Here is the information, to educate anyone who wants to read about another episode, in regards to the gun violence brutality conversation?
From Wikipedia:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Whitman
"Charles Joseph Whitman (June 24, 1941 – August 1, 1966) was an American mass murderer who became infamous as the "Texas Tower Sniper." On August 1, 1966, he used knives in the slayings of his mother and his wife in their respective homes and then went to the University of Texas in Austin with multiple firearms and began indiscriminately shooting at people. He fatally shot three people inside the university tower. He then went to the tower's 28th-floor observation deck, where he fired at random people for some 96 minutes, killing an additional 11 people, including an unborn child, and wounding 31 others before he was shot dead by Austin police officer Houston McCoy. Whitman killed a total of 17 people; the 17th victim died 35 years later from injuries sustained in the attack.[2][3][4][5] "
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seung-Hui_Cho
"Seung-Hui Cho (조승희 in Korean, properly Cho Seung-Hui;[1] January 18, 1984 – April 16, 2007) was a South Korean-born spree killer and mass murdererwho killed 32 people and wounded 17 others when he was armed with two semi-automatic pistols on April 16, 2007, at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.[2] An additional six people were injured jumping from windows to escape.[3] Cho was a senior-levelundergraduate student at the university. The shooting rampage came to be known as the Virginia Tech shooting.[4][5] Cho committed suicide after police breached the doors of the building where most of the shooting had taken place. His body is buried in Fairfax, Virginia. "
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting
"The Sandy Hook Elementary School shootingoccurred on December 14, 2012, in Newtown, Connecticut, United States, when 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shot 20 children between six and seven years old, and six adult staff members. Before driving to the school, he shot and killed his mother at their Newtown home. As first responders arrived at the school, Lanza committed suicide by shooting himself in the head."
"The incident was the deadliest mass shooting at either a high school or grade school in U.S. history and the fourth-deadliest mass shooting by a single person in U.S. history.[a] The shooting prompted renewed debate about gun control in the United States, including proposals to make the background-check system universal, and for new federal and state gun legislation banning the sale and manufacture of certain types of semi-automatic firearms and magazines with more than ten rounds of ammunition.
A November 2013 report issued by the Connecticut State Attorney's office concluded that Lanza acted alone and planned his actions, but provided no indication why he did so, or why he targeted the school. A report issued by the Office of the Child Advocate in November 2014 said that Lanza had Asperger's syndrome and as a teenager suffered from depression, anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder, but concluded that they had "neither caused nor led to his murderous acts." The report went on to say, "his severe and deteriorating internalized mental health problems ... combined with an atypical preoccupation with violence ... (and) access to deadly weapons ... proved a recipe for mass murder".[18] "
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbine_High_School_massacre
"The Columbine High School massacre was a school shooting that occurred on April 20, 1999, at Columbine High School in Columbine, Colorado, United States.[1][2][n 1] The perpetrators, twelfth grade(senior) students Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, murdered 12 students and one teacher. Ten students were killed in the library, where the pair subsequently committed suicide. At the time, it was the deadliest shooting at a high school in United States history. The crime has inspired several copycats, and "Columbine" has become a byword for a school shooting."
"The two perpetrators injured 21 additional people with gunshots and also exchanged gunfire with the police. Another three people were injured trying to escape the school. In addition to the shootings, the attack involved several homemade bombs. The largest of these were placed in the cafeteria; car bombs were also placed in the parking lot and at another location that was intended to divert first responders.
The motive remains unclear, but the pair planned the crime for about a year and wished for the massacre to rival the Oklahoma City bombing and cause the most deaths in United States history. USA Todayreferred to the attack as "planned as a grand, if badly implemented, terrorist bombing."[5]
The police were slow to enter the school, and they were heavily criticized for not intervening during the shooting. The incident resulted in the introduction of the Immediate Action Rapid Deployment tactic, which is used in situations where an active shooter is trying to kill people rather than take hostages. Columbine also resulted in an increased emphasis on school security with zero tolerance policies. Debates were sparked over gun control laws and gun culture, high school cliques, subcultures, and bullying. Also discussed were the moral panic over goths, social outcasts, the use of pharmaceutical antidepressantsby teenagers, teenage Internet use and violence in video games. "
The above individuals, their stories, speak for themselves, and how anyone, may view their stories in relation to their pro gun views, or their pro public views, is dependent upon the individual, interpretating the individual stories, to the very core, of who they are inside of themselves.
Would it be fair to say, that the above historical stories, tell both sides of each story, on their own?
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.56  
  Sources: 76  
  Relevant (Beta): 23%  
  Learn More About Debra
Exactly, who is the "us," that you are referring to?
"You obviously you aren't hearing us."
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 34%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 63%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.76  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra