The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Should Abortion Be Legal?
in United States
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: main reason    innocent child   adoption process   abortion  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
I would just like to address your question in basic principle. Are all woman guilty of a crime if all woman make a confession to the same kind of crime?
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.1  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: woman    crime   basic principle   opinion  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.52  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: new laws    debate reasons   woman   murder  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
1.This is just for debate reasons but if I shot a child and they are dead should I be charged with murder?
2. Now if I stabbed a woman in the stomach killing a child they are carrying but the woman does not die should I be charged with murder?
The comparison is off you were not making a self-incriminating admission.
I shot a child and woman they are dead should I be charged with murder? yes.
I stabbed a woman in the stomach killing a child she is carrying but the woman does not die should I be charged with murder? Yes. You do not share the united state the woman does with all other woman who are pregnant, and who may be capable to become pregnant. This United state can then be used in a way that creates all woman as equal, all woman perform a pregnancy abortion by failing to become pregnant as result of ovulation. They, woman who ovulate, are in truth murdering a child every time this happens which is about 12 times a year.
When picking one murder out by the truth made on officially stopping the life that has started, this is regardless of whole truth. When woman start admitting in whole truth to pregnancy abortions after saying no to sexual relationship demonstrating her authority over life this is a truth. On either side of united state the woman's burden of lethal force does not waver.
I must also advise of a common defense to the general welfare of United State Constitution. Female Specific Amputation is not abortion and would be curtail in representation of woman in the United state of Armed Serves in Military order.
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: united state    behalf of all woman   lethal force   common defense  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 19%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Adoption    abortion      
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Realistically adoption isn’t an alternative to pregnancy abortion though not wrong it is not right as united state. In basic principle the way a pregnancy abortion take place are.
1. A woman or man will decline to have sexual intercourse.
2. A woman and/or man will donate sperm or egg to scientific research.
3. A female specific amputation takes place.
Adoption by basic principle.
A child who is born without legal guardian is made a property of the state; the property is then released as a form of legal slave to the public or ages out as adult. Maintaining the legal slave is either a paid proposition by direct payment to the assigned guardian or is an indirect proposition in which taxation reduction is to be the motivation with emotional attachment.
Adoption is not an alternative to officially stopping a human life that has been recognized as beginning.
1. Any woman who ovulated is still having a pregnancy abortion and simply does not admit this as a crime publicly.
2. A woman can still be sacrificed in a murder on behalf of a child. Child birth is a risk and a application of lethal force in its creation of posterity. The refusal of Female specific amputation places the burden of risk on those who make a denial on that request under general welfare of life. Whereas "Husband" is licensed by state to assume the power of attorney on behalf of the a woman to except the will and desire she alone holds to pay cost of the child, or not.
3. A child can still be sacrificed in a murder on behalf of a woman. The refusal of Female specific amputation places the burden of risk on those who make a denial on that request under general welfare of life.
The state of the union of woman and reproduction in a united state is to create all woman as equal in basic principle and legal precedent.
In whole truth adoption is an alterative to a limited number of Female specific amputations.
  Considerate: 73%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.82  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 46%  
  Learn More About Debra
The idea of murder is a strong principle. To address this notion in basic principle a female specific amputation cannot be in truth a murder as the victim who is lost from posterity is unknown by the individual woman who must make the call on behalf of a future. A woman can not be a serial killer murdering a stranger as she up until this point has been allowed to kill all of that child's brother and sisters without objection. The argument of law is who is, and who is not holding all woman as created equal by grievance filed against United States Constitution.
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.1  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: serial killer    new laws   female specific amputation   basic principle  
  Relevant (Beta): 75%  
  Learn More About Debra
Both, male, and female, birth control?
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 53%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: birth control    adoption   option   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 29%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: basic principle    birth of a baby   principles of genetic parent   united states  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
The idea of slavery held by interpretation of amendment of constitutional principle must be addresses correctly on basic principle of POW status. Meaning the 13 amendment is either an article of the 1st amendment by reform of religious liberties. Or and article of the 5th Amendment in relationship to due process of reprteatation to united state by basic principle and legal precedent.
Contraception, female specific amputation, and pregnancy abortions made by men and woman before the egg’s life is made longer by fertilization are all state that limits childbirth and can be placed in a union. To then be addressed as a state of the union.
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.76  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: amendment of constitutional principle    basic principle   pregnancy abortions   united state  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Where's your legitimate, and real world evidence, to support this statement from you?
"and when children are sold to couples outside the protected principles of genetic parent it is a form of slavery. Which is not to exist any more as laws prohibit slavery as a trade in the united states."
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
My main argument is bodily autonomy/integrity, which is usually considered a human right... It means a person has control over who or what uses their body, for what, and for how long. It's why you cannot be forced to donate blood, tissue, organs. Even if you're dead, even if it would save or improve 20 lives... It's why someone can't touch you, have sex with you, or use your body in any way without your continuous consent.
A fetus is using someone's body parts. Therefore, under bodily autonomy it is there by permission, not by right. It needs a person continuous consent. if they deny or withdraw consent, for any reason whatsoever, the pregnant person has a right to remove them from that moment. A fetus is equal in this regard because if I need someone else's body parts to live, they also can legally deny me their use.
By saying a fetus has a right to someone's body parts until it's born, despite the pregnant person's wishes, you're doing 2 things...
1: Granting a fetus more rights to other people's body part than any born person.
2: Awarding a pregnant person less rights to their body than a corpse.
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: body parts    bodily autonomy   main argument   human right  
  Relevant (Beta): 54%  
  Learn More About Debra
Where's your legitimate, and real world evidence, to support this statement from you? Justice does not hold a United State with Criminal intent and human retribution TKDB. Justice is at liberty to be applied in a ongoing pursuit to tranquility and Happiness in formation of a more perfect union.
I am not addressing a criminal accusation this is a truth to address an existing state of the union created under constitutional basic principle between adoption and human pregnancy, there was never a clear distinction made between a Prisoner of War then sold into private hands, with the forced birthing of a child by woman under order of law, the child then made a salve by interpretation of law not basic United States Constitutional address. There is nothing to cite, as precedent it is just a hidden way to keep slavery alive and out of the general view of the population.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: United State    perfect union   constitutional basic principle   clear distinction  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
A woman's autonomy is a good justification as a idea of self-defense in connection to any admission/accusation a woman may have made. It simply does not create a desired equality between all woman who can in whole truth become pregnant. To form a liberty and justice for all the idea of defending the woman from crime must be abandoned. To understand the criminal possibility is human, the legislation in governing does not need this personal association to be linked to truth and whole truth. The legislation is to assemble an impartial dialog setting all woman as created equal before the world. This is a big call as a job description.
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: united state    criminal possibility   basic principle   good justification  
  Relevant (Beta): 61%  
  Learn More About Debra
Are you maybe an ex attorney, or a former law professor?
Because you seem to express, the same self expressed rhetoric for seemingly all of your counter arguments?
"Justice does not hold a United State with Criminal intent and human retribution TKDB. Justice is at liberty to be applied in a ongoing pursuit to tranquility and Happiness in formation of a more perfect union.
I am not addressing a criminal accusation this is a truth to address an existing state of the union created under constitutional basic principle between adoption and human pregnancy, there was never a clear distinction made between a Prisoner of War then sold into private hands, with the forced birthing of a child by woman under order of law, the child then made a salve by interpretation of law not basic United States Constitutional address. There is nothing to cite, as precedent it is just a hidden way to keep slavery alive and out of the general view of the population."
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 37%  
  Substantial: 30%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: human life    cases   Alabama    
  Relevant (Beta): 77%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 33%  
  Substantial: 49%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Birth control    mother   rape    
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 26%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: rape victims         
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 29%  
  Substantial: 28%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: body    consent      
  Relevant (Beta): 69%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: blood relatives    Adoption   slavery   parts of this argument  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 26%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: child    womb      
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 29%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: reproductive slavery    slave   rape surivor   birth  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: peoples backgrounds    such things   simple things   pills  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 24%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: unwanted use of my reproductive organs    Answer   rape   question  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: unfortunate thing    caring family   opinion   child  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 19%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: rape victim    body   rapist   birth  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 39%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: victim route    play victim   group of friends   triumph  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
When a surgical procedure must be done in utero anesthetic is given to both the female and the baby, for obvious reasons. With current advancements in medicine babies can be born earlier than their due date and do just fine.
the age old questions
@RyanHough you may wish to consider muting certain people, I've muted TKDB I don't see his posts or replies, it's a very nice feature.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: life    current laws   heart beat   obvious reasons  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
So in truth are you just saying slavery is not all bad?
You do understand we do not get the child's consent to be born as a parent?
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 58%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: child's consent    truth   slavery   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
So in truth are you just saying slavery is not all bad?
You do understand we do not get the child's consent to be born as a parent?
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 58%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: child's consent    truth   slavery   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Do you still believe you lack the experience to create all woman as equal under legal precedent? In the name of liberty and justice for all, removing a self-incrimination from one of many hard to prove crime, we get change female specific amputation from descriptions like Pregnancy abortion. The name of the basic principal has been change to protect the innocent not to exploit them.
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.86  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
It is a little more complicate than just that. Woman have been by choice placed in a Congregational Armed Service, which then can become a Presidential Armed Service. Unwittingly all woman's right to autonomism control to there body was forfeit. All Right. Rape can be described a weapon of combat, prior to entry and was understood as part of the risk, therefor female specific amputation is used to remove the possible cause to death. Like previously mentioned pregnancy by sexual assault is not rape it is attempted murder in basic principle.
  Considerate: 52%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.66  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: rape victim    sexual assault   weapon of combat   part of the risk  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 32%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: slavery    thing   Abortion   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
The funny thing is I just wanted to see all sides of this debate, instead, I got a jumble of people who are all idiots who just want what they think is best, not what would be best for the majority. This argument also had people like @YeshuaRedeemed who just yell at me for debate and its quite annoying. I was hoping to get logical and well-rounded ANSWERS, not questions asking me to answer my own question.
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: funny thing    arguments   sides of this debate   jumble of people  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: pregnancy termination    slavery   adoption   thing  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Adoption isnt slavery         
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
A majority is not a United State and its overall numerical value is made less important with the addition of truth. We have been arguing this debate quite some time so the differences we all have are getting to be over a wider understanding of problems. Try not to become frustrated take a break if needed.
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: United State    funny thing   sides of this debate   overall numerical value  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra
If you shot a child, yes you should be charged with murder...
If you stab a woman in the stomach ending a pregnancy, you should be charged with attempted murder but the fact that there was a pregnancy should not add another murder charge but rather be an aggravating factor that could warrant an additional 5-25+ years in jail... It cannot be "murder" because you can only murder a person, and fetuses are not persons...
This is only true in some states, so it's not really a valid argument in regard to abortion in itself, no? If it was true everywhere ok but it's not...
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
A fetus is there by permission granted by the woman this permission may be withdrawn at her will anything else is tyranny.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: fetus trump    fetus   woman   Abortion  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 47%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: opinion    woman   pregnancy   murder  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 54%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say .... I dont believe that a woman should be able to terminate a pregnancy.
My reply .....Yes , you’ve said
You say ......That is murder.
My reply ....It’s not
You say ....That is my opinion and it will not change, y'all can think what you want but my opinion is final.
My reply .....What are you doing on a debate site?
  Considerate: 67%  
  Substantial: 65%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: ....     final.My reply   reply   opinion  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
Dee said:
Abortion should be legal a woman should have the right to decide as its her body , why should the fetus be granted a right while denying a woman a right to bodily autonomy? Why does any implied right of the fetus trump that of the woman?
very simple really human life > all generally speaking
rights come into conflict all the time and someone will have their rights while the other will not if they both can't be accommodated.
really this is very simple.
no matter what right you claim to have none of them gives you the right to murder another human (self defense is not murder so don't bother trying that nonsense)
we have property rights, true? Look up some cases where people used deadly force to protect their property rather than self defense.
I'll give you some help https://lawshelf.com/courseware/entry/protection-of-property
"It is important to remember that deadly force can never be used simply to defend property against someone else’s interference with that property, even if that interference is unlawful and even if there is no other way to prevent that interference."
so when it comes to the death/killing of another human being only the right to self defense matters, no other rights you think you have matter.
this is why no one wants to define a time when a baby is a baby or human, that should be obvious now if it wasn't already.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.96  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 67%  
  Learn More About Debra
So, say for example that I need a kidney transplant or I'll die and it happens that you're the only one with a compatible kidney, if you don't agree to give me one I'll definitely die... Are you saying I would be justified to force you to give me your kidney whether you want to or not?
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: kidney transplant    compatible kidney   example   kidney  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
you would not be justified because I'm not murdering you or knowingly causing your death. you are talking about saving a life vs taking a life
However if someone were to do something that purposefully puts another in the situation you describe, if they are compatible I would say yes they must give up a kidney because they were a direct cause as to why the other person lost theirs and needs one to save their life.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: kidney transplant    direct cause   compatible kidney   situation  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
If you're are the only compatible donor and you refuse, you will knowingly cause my death...
Say someone trips and fall off a bridge (they are really unlucky...), this person barely holds on by one hand, I happen to pass by, would I be to blame if I did nothing and this person died? I'm not the one who placed him in that situation after all, how is that any different?
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: only compatible donor    trips   person   bridge  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
you did not put that person in their predicament that is true, you have no obligation.
let's say this person managed to grab a rope, your rope, you would not be justified in cutting it or taking it way such that it would cause their death, right? Because their right to life is > property, inconvenience, pretty much everything else. Do you agree that it should be that way? You steal my hat should I be able to shoot you in the back as you run away to get my hat back?
there is no higher value placed on anything that I can think of than a human life, do you disagree?
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: only compatible donor    higher value   human life   person  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say ......very simple really human life > all generally speaking
My reply .....You dodged , I asked why the implied right of the fetus trumps the right of the woman?
You say ......rights come into conflict all the time and someone will have their rights while the other will not if they both can't be accommodated.
really this is very simple.
My reply .....But in this case you wish to deny someone as in the woman their right to bodily autonomy , really it’s very simple
You say .....no matter what right you claim to have none of them gives you the right to murder another human (self defense is not murder so don't bother trying that nonsense)
My reply .....It’s not murder , why aren’t women who abort given life imprisonment for murder if that’s the case?
You say .....we have property rights, true? Look up some cases where people used deadly force to protect their property rather than self defense.
I'll give you some help https://lawshelf.com/courseware/entry/protection-of-property
My reply ......I’m not talking about property do try and keep up will you. It’s you need all the help you can get.
You say ....."It is important to remember that deadly force can never be used simply to defend property against someone else’s interference with that property, even if that interference is unlawful and even if there is no other way to prevent that interference."
My reply .....Why are you bleating on about property rights?
You say ......when it comes to the death/killing of another human being only the right to self defense matters, no other rights you think you have matter.
My reply .....Thanks for your opinion is that your argument?
You say ....this is why no one wants to define a time when a baby is a baby or human, that should be obvious now if it wasn't already.
My reply ....What should be obvious?
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.1  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra
With regards to human life value, I don't think they are all equally valuable... But compared to a car or the likes, sure... But death is a part of life, I could say that giving birth is in fact condemning someone to die, weird but not false...
Now you say I'd be under no obligation to save the person hanging from the bridge, what about the laws about non-assistance to someone in danger (Duty to rescue) ? In many places, it would warrant manslaughter charges but to be fair, I don't think it (Duty to rescue) exists in the US, not surprising really... So ok, I'll refrain from using this argument as it doesn't matter in the US...
But what is your view on the bodily autonomy principle? To reiterate...
Bodily autonomy/integrity, which is usually considered a human right, means a person has control over who or what uses their body, for what, and for how long. It's why you cannot be forced to donate blood, tissue, organs. Even if you're dead, even if it would save or improve 20 lives... It's why someone can't touch you, have sex with you, or use your body in any way without your continuous consent.
A fetus is using someone's body parts. Therefore, under bodily autonomy it is there by permission, not by right. It needs a person continuous consent. if they deny or withdraw consent, for any reason whatsoever, the pregnant person has a right to remove them from that moment. A fetus is equal in this regard because if I need someone else's body parts to live, they also can legally deny me their use.
By saying a fetus has a right to someone's body parts until it's born, despite the pregnant person's wishes, you're doing 2 things...
1: Granting a fetus more rights to other people's body part than any born person.
2: Awarding a pregnant person less rights to their body than a corpse.
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: bodily autonomy principle    part of life   human right   body parts  
  Relevant (Beta): 61%  
  Learn More About Debra