Should the U.S. decrease military spending? - DebateIsland Development Environment The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com
frame

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

DebateIsland Development Environment


Communities

The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!

Should the U.S. decrease military spending?
in United States

By PoguePogue 554 Pts
The U.S. spends more on defense than the next 8 nations combined. It also accounts for about 34% of what the world spends on defense. So should it be decreased?  
billpassedjoecavalry
  1. Live Poll

    Should the U.S. decrease military spending?

    7 votes
    1. Yes, we spend to much and could be used for better programs.
      71.43%
    2. No, we need the super powerful military.
      28.57%
I could either have the future pass me or l could create it. 

“We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.” - Benjamin Franklin  So flat Earthers, man-made climate change deniers, and just science deniers.

I friended myself! 
About Persuade Me

Persuaded Argument

  • Winning Argument ✓
    Yes, that money can be invested into other programs or things. I’m not sure if the money they are spending towards military is needed. Some may be.



Debra AI Prediction

Predicted To Win
Predicted 2nd Place
Tie
Margin

Details +



Arguments

  • edited December 2017
    No, social spending is always a failure.  50 years ago, LBJ declared a war on poverty.  We are no closer to solving poverty now than when that war began.  Social spending hasn't solved ANY of the problems they set out to solve. 

    Military spending, OTOH, should be increased, as it has been responsible for most of our country's major booms; bomber research in WWI led to the development of civilian airliners, WWII code-breaking research led to computers, military communications research led to the microwave, semi-conductors, cellular communications, etc, et al. The i-phone wouldn't have been possible without military research.

    https://geopoliticalfutures.com/irony-high-tech/

  • No, the military should be funded. They defend the US.
    DebateIslander and a DebateIsland.com lover. 
  • No, the military should be funded. They defend the US.
    The military should be funded, but the question is whether or not we should decrease the funding and accept a more diplomatic approach. We could use some of the money for education, health, etc.
    i fart cows
  • No, the military should be funded. They defend the US.
    My question was not to stop funding. It was if we should decrease it.
    I could either have the future pass me or l could create it. 

    “We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.” - Benjamin Franklin  So flat Earthers, man-made climate change deniers, and just science deniers.

    I friended myself! 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Back To Top

DebateIsland.com

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
2019 DebateIsland.com, All rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Awesome Debates
BestDealWins.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch