The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Would just taxing rich people be a good compromise?
in Economy
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
The rich get part their money taken away
Everyone else gets to not pay taxes
What do rich people get from your compromise?
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
@CYDdharta ~%40 maybe? I think it could vary too based on how much money one has. It’s like a mini-progressive tax.
@BaconToes Depends on their views. Some rich people are leftists, so they would like spending money on the government, and some are conservatives/libertarians who might not like personally paying taxes but they might be satisfied that the money is not being taken from everyone else. Again this plan is not aimed at satisfying rich people as an entire group.
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 54%  
  Learn More About Debra
There is a faulty assumption. If rich leftists actually wanted to spend more on the government, they are free to do so. Instead, they take as much advantage of loopholes carve-outs and tax havens as anyone else.
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Of course rich leftists want the government to have the funding for social programs, but they don't want to be the ones funding it. If they seriously wanted to fund such programs, they are free to do so now. Instead, they try to pay as little in taxes as possible, just like everyone else.
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yea I'd have to tweak the specific tax rates but if it works out, do you support this in principle, that's the question
If they try to pay as little in taxes as possible then wouldn't raising the tax rate be sufficient because it raises the minimum they need to pay?
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
You still haven't answered this:
What does the rich get from this "compromise"
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.32  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 47%  
  Learn More About Debra
@CYDdharta what things would people get for free here?
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.46  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 61%  
  Learn More About Debra
The key to a true societal prosperity, in my opinion, is taking governmental actions that benefit all economical and social groups in some way - or, at least, do not disadvantage any group significantly. Whenever an economical or societal group holding a significant amount of power in the state is dismissed, there is a potential for that effect to be felt across the whole society. Plainly speaking, simply taking income away from the rich will, through indirect effects, lead to the income being taken away from everyone. More elegant solutions are needed to improve the wealth distribution in the society without severe adverse effects.
  Considerate: 96%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 56%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra