The border wall, and border security. - DebateIsland Development Environment The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com
frame

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

DebateIsland Development Environment


The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!

The border wall, and border security.
in Immigration

By TTKDBTTKDB 265 Pts


This video features the current POTUS, and others, in a conversation in regards to the border wall, and border security.

The video is both educational and very telling.

The take away from the video is this, the current POTUS seems to be in favor of a border wall, and border security, while some of the other political representatives in the video seem to be in favor of border security only?

The video offers various talking points to have a conversation over.

So, what are some and their positions?

A) Border wall, and border security?

Or B) Border security only?

Apparently, where there are sections of the border wall in place, the numbers of illegal immigrants have been greatly reduced? 

Verses the other sections of the border, where there isn't a wall? 

It would seem that where there is a section of the border wall in place, along with border security, a combined of the two works better, than just having border security by itself, without a border wall? 


Zombieguy1987



Debra AI Prediction

Predicted To Win
Predicted 2nd Place
Tie
Margin

Details +



Arguments

  • I think that a border wall, and border security together is the better option. 
    Zombieguy1987ApplesauceGeorge_Horse
  • @Zombieguy1987

    Care to comment?

    Who do you agree with?

    The POTUS?

    Or with some of the liberals? 

    Or do you maybe view the border wall, and or border security altogether as irrelevant? 

    What might be your solution to the illegal immigrants coming into the United States illegally? 





    George_Horse
  • I think these people at the office, who are supposed to deliver on some expectations from Americans, should ask themselves a different question: "What investments do Americans want from us"? Does an average lawyer from San Francisco want $16 billion spent on a wall in the desert, or $16 billions spent, say, on eliminating the unnecessary bureaucracy the lawyer has to deal with every day? I think the answer is obvious.

    The "wall" should, at most, be the matter of the local (state or municipal) authorities. The Federal government should focus on more general and essential elements in policy-making. If Trump really wants to deal with the illegal immigration, then he must find more cost-effective solutions, leading to less intrusion into the individual state affairs.

    When I pay my taxes, I do not expect a "wall" on the other end of the country in return: I expect something in return that will benefit me personally. I do not see how a wall benefits me in any way, and I do not remember when was the last time I saw a Spanish-speaking person in this area. I would prefer my money to be spent on something more immediate, such as infrastructure in my state, for example - not on something relevant only to people thousands miles away from my location.
    Zombieguy1987
  • https://www.google.com/search?q=victims+of+religion&safe=active&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=x&ved=0ahukewihu9jugorfahwkmeakhbtib00q_auidigb&biw=1920&bih=963&safe=active

    Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news

    Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom 

    http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  • walls work otherwise the Obama's wouldn't have had one built around their new home, or used in prisons, various other countries etc etc.  These 2....people are fine with fences but not a wall, though I believe they were ok with it at various points in the much too lengthy careers wasting our tax money with they over inflated salaries.
    Zombieguy1987George_Horse
    "I'm just a soul whose intentions are good
    Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
    The Animals
  • @Zombieguy1987

    Do you know what is missing from that debate?

    The transparent conversation that took place in the Oval Office between the POTUS Donald Trump, The Minority Leader of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, and Senate Minority Leader Incumbent Chuck Schumer, and Vice President Mike Pence.

    That conversation showed the millions of the citizens in the country, via those separate perspectives how the border wall, and the border wall security is apparently viewed? 

    And many supporters, who are apparently in favor of the border wall, have expressed their support for the border wall, and liked what the President said in the Oval Office, via watching the news, and listening to the news on the radio. 
    Zombieguy1987ApplesauceGeorge_Horse
  • @Zombieguy1987

    What you apparently view as irrelevant, apparently there are millions who view the border wall differently from your individual perspective?

    A follow up question for you:
    It would seem that you are apparently anti border wall?

    Would you then maybe, view yourself as pro illegal immigrant? 


    Zombieguy1987
  • @TTKDB ;
    Did you read the arguement that i linked?

    No, I'm not pro illegal immigration.

    It's just a wall WILL NOT WORK!

    Immigrants will just go up, down, around, fly or swim past the wall. Meaning it would be the biggest waste of tax payer money in the history of the U.S

    Also, most illegal immigrants overstay the visa they use to enter the U.S

    How will a wall stop that?
    https://www.google.com/search?q=victims+of+religion&safe=active&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=x&ved=0ahukewihu9jugorfahwkmeakhbtib00q_auidigb&biw=1920&bih=963&safe=active

    Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news

    Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom 

    http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  • @Zombieguy1987

    Show me what you view as a fallacy? 

    Wheres your evidence? 
    George_Horse
  • TTKDB said:
    @Zombieguy1987

    Show me what you view as a fallacy? 

    Wheres your evidence? 
    Your assumptions...

    You assume, simply because i'm opposed to the idea of a wall, means i'm pro-illegal immigration
    George_Horse
    https://www.google.com/search?q=victims+of+religion&safe=active&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=x&ved=0ahukewihu9jugorfahwkmeakhbtib00q_auidigb&biw=1920&bih=963&safe=active

    Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news

    Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom 

    http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  • @Applesauce

    Walls certainly have their uses, but building a wall every time one wants to deter someone from coming in is not practical. A wall around my apartment guarantees my privacy and safety; a wall around a marketplace does not guarantee anything other than inconvenience for both the traders and the buyers.

    A wall worked in Berlin, and it works in Pyongyang. In both cases, the amount of resources and personnel that had/has to maintain the wall has been/is astronomical - and those walls are tiny, compared to the wall aimed to deter Mexicans from coming in. 

    The wall is about the least cost-effective and practical solution possible in this situation. A minefield would make more sense than a wall. Now, a minefield would violate countless human rights conventions - but it would, at least, do its job. While the wall, as I have said many times on this website, can be easily passed with a $4 investment into a wooden ladder - unless the wall is properly manned, which would require such outrageous amount of resources, that Obamacare would look like a family picnic on Sunday in comparison.
    Zombieguy1987CYDdharta
  • @MayCaesar

    Trump in the video made some statistical claims to the effectiveness of the walls that have been completed and neither Nutty Nancy or Cryin Chuck challenged those figures, or anytime after that I know of.  I'm not sure the 4 dollar ladder would work given their design.  But it can't go unmanned and I don't know if anyone is saying it can or should.  The wall is only part of the solution and again i don't know if anyone is saying it's the only one needed.
    The claim that many have turned back when they couldn't easily get in hasn't been challenged or disproved either.  

    IMO the best barrier would be the razor wire, high and deep with drones and patrols of course, would be so cheap and easy to maintain, but the bleeding hearts wouldn't go for that now would they, you see there's no other real choices.  The fences they build in the past where inadequate and no virtually useless.  Because there is no longer and meaningful compromise in government, here we are.

    If it were up to me, I'd put military bases and training ground the whole length of the border, problem solved. lol
    Zombieguy1987CYDdhartaGeorge_Horse
    "I'm just a soul whose intentions are good
    Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
    The Animals
  • @Zombieguy1987

    "Your assumptions...

    You assume, simply because i'm opposed to the idea of a wall, means i'm pro-illegal immigration"

    A hypothesis on the word assumption:

    An immigrant coming to the United States illegally, maybe because of one of two factor's, based on "assumptions?"

    If they can hypothetically speaking, get into the country illegally instead of utilizing the legal process, they can apparently get sanctuary in one of the 300 sanctuary cities in the United States?

    (I wonder how some of the citizens in some of those sanctuary cities feel about the illegal immigrants getting sanctuary in those cities?

    Doing interviews with some of the the citizens in those cities, and asking them how they feel about the illegal immigrants being given sanctuary in those cities, where those citizens live? And if they agree with the sanctuary status or not?)

    And second, hypothetically speaking, if they can maybe get work with this or that business that is maybe/ allegedly utilizing illegal immigrants to do work, for their businesses? 

    Is it legal or illegal to utilize some of the illegal immigrants in that hypothetical situation? 

    (Because of the below law, is why I pose the question above.)

    From Wikipedia: 

    "Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986

    The Immigration Reform and Control Act(IRCA), Pub.L. 99–603, 100 Stat. 3445, enacted November 6, 1986, also known as the Simpson–Mazzoli Act or the Reagan Amnesty,[1] signed into law by Ronald Reagan on November 6, 1986, is an Act of Congresswhich reformed United States immigration law. The Act[2]

    • required employers to attest to their employees' immigration status;
    • made it illegal to hire or recruit illegal immigrants knowingly;
    • legalized certain seasonal agricultural undocumented immigrants, and;
    • legalized undocumented immigrants who entered the United States before January 1, 1982 and had resided there continuously with the penalty of a fine, back taxes due, and admission of guilt; candidates were required to prove that they were not guilty of crimes, that they were in the country before January 1, 1982, and that they possessed at least a minimal knowledge about U.S. history, government, and the English language.'


    Zombieguy1987
  • @Zombieguy1987

    No comment for the previous points of view? 
    Zombieguy1987
  • Nancy Pelosi was trying to show how trump lied to the American taxpayers. If Mexico is supposed to pay for the wall, why is trump asking for it to be funded in the budget? 
    Zombieguy1987CYDdhartaGeorge_HorseNathaniel_B
  • TTKDB said:
    @Zombieguy1987

    No comment for the previous points of view? 
    This is why a wall will not work


    Nathaniel_B
    https://www.google.com/search?q=victims+of+religion&safe=active&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=x&ved=0ahukewihu9jugorfahwkmeakhbtib00q_auidigb&biw=1920&bih=963&safe=active

    Blues and Raptors handed two very toxic teams embarrassing losses, 95% of the sports world is rejoicing in the news

    Repealing the Second Amendment is the first step to Totalitarianism, and it needs to be prevented to protect our freedom 

    http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
Sign In or Register to comment.

Back To Top

DebateIsland.com

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
2019 DebateIsland.com, All rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Awesome Debates
BestDealWins.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch