Is the universe infinitely old, violating the second law of thermodynamics, or did the universe arise by natural means out of nothing, violating the first law of thermodynamics. You have no third alternative. If you wish to state there is a third alternative, state your scientific or philosophical credentials.
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
Your argument assumes causality - which under standard conditions is a no-brainer and would be a standard assumption. Unfortunately for your argument, prior to the big bang when space was compressed to a single point, that also means time and hence causality did not exist.
Although we cannot condense all matter into a single point to test the theory, this is the expected outcome based on Einsteins theory of special relativity and we can test that in more measurable ways to check that it confirms with reality.
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 55%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 44%  
  Substantial: 8%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 55%  
  Substantial: 43%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_special_relativity
Also if you aren't familiar with a subject, you shouldn't make unsupported claims about it as you'll often be wrong - as evidenced by your claim that there is no proof for special relativity when it is actually something scientists have been finding proof for for over 100 years as described in the links above.
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.42  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 38%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Laws of thermodynamics are not strictly "laws" as is a fundamental property of the Universe. They simply describe the fact that statistically large numbers of objects subjected to the same evolution rules are extremely likely to be found near the peak of the probability distribution, than anywhere else. This is what the entropy growth is about (with time, matter spreads more and more uniformly around the Universe statistically), this is what the temperature equalisation is about (speeds of atoms are likely to be well mixed up, and very unlikely to have an ordered structure after a long period of mixing), and this is what the entire field of thermodynamics is about.
Analogy: suppose you have 1,000,000 pennies. You toss them all into a vending machine and turn the machine on. After a while, you turn it off and, picking penny by penny up, calculate how many heads and tails there are in the machine. With incredibly high probability, the number of tails will be very close to 500,000. It can be 499,500, it *could* be 499,000 - but it will not be 400,000 realistically, unless you used uneven coins.
Same here. There is no physical law prohibiting, say, two reservoirs put near each other to maintain a difference in temperatures. But in probabilistic terms, this will not happen, and when you return a few days later to measure their temperatures, the temperatures will be very-very close, well beyond our ability to measure the difference.
I would recommend doing a bit of self-educating before trying to dismantle the results of centuries of research by millions scientists with a short online argument.
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
Question for Anti-Science Evolutionists
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.24  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 29%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 70%  
  Learn More About Debra
Evolution is fact , most rational beings except this the exception being some religious evolution deniers mainly Americans unfortunately
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 39%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
@sear
The only thing that has change on this cartoon is scale. The map is now of the universe, and the Ship is now a starship.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 42%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 73%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.46  
  Sources: 4  
  Relevant (Beta): 33%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 13%  
  Substantial: 20%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 50%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra